Sega Lord X doesn't like Suzuki? How can you be a Sega fan and not enjoy Yu Suzuki...?
What DBL said; with all of the videos SLX has written about super scalers, OutRun, Sega Arcade games in general, etc., etc., he has never mentioned or given a bit of talking time, to Yu.
Just an FYI, almost all of us on here know more about Sega and have played more, than he has; his channel is essentially, "my life with Sega and the things I like," rather than an objective, "all about Sega," channel, like I originally thought (his SMS content is minimal and he has almost NOTHING about the Dreamcast, aside from some compilation videos. And the SG-1000, 32X, Pico or handhelds? Good luck. I think he has 1 GG video, maybe 2).
(Rant time, sorry
)
The first video I saw of his, was the super scaler one and it is far and away his best video; super informative, lots of great content and his pretentiousness doesn't show up from the word go. As time goes on though, his videos have become much more stale; reusing the same video and content from previous videos (I'm talking the same stuff in 4 different videos), constantly shitting on good games, simply because he doesn't like them (more on this in a bit) and simply talking about the same concepts and games, in every video. Then he did the Alex Kidd episode...
(I will admit, I called the video a fraud; not the nicest way to introduce myself, I know.
I pointed out some flaws in his playing of the games: For example, in Alex Kidd the Lost Stars, there is a section with Lightning Walls that requires a bit of strategy to get through, involving jumping and patience; you can figure it out with trial and error, after a few attempts. He just pressed forward the whole time, to, "show how unforgiving the game is." I beat LS my VERY first time playing it on the SMS. Full-stop; it is NOT a hard game at all, but it does require some trial and error.
We all know AK in the Enchanted Castle (the only Genesis title) is not the best game of the AK games, but it is a solid 8/10 game, as it is more-than playable, not too difficult, has built-in systems that work and require a learning curve and is an enjoyable experience; any game that can be 1 CC'd and it isn't due to being super-easy, is a well-built game.
He shit on the game throughout the entire time and his footage didn't go past certain levels, so obviously he didn't play it enough. Not to mention, there were flaws in how he was describing the game (IE; there is an item you can obtain, to have an advantage during Rock Paper Scissors; he either didn't know or neglected to mention it). Basically, he didn't give the game a fair shake (and as a result, it made me question if he's given other games fair shakes) and I commented on that video, stating why I felt that the game is better than he gave it credit for (this included 3 points and a decent-length of a comment; you guys know how much I write lol).
EDIT*** I remember now!!! It wasn't that he neglected to mention it, HE ACTUALLY GOT ONE IN-GAME AND USED IT, only to not properly play Rock, Paper, Scissors and lose a life. I mean, when you purposely **** up in game to, "show how bad it is," come on. Fraudulent.
I then went on a tiny rant how his vids are so subjective, without mentioning that fact (and the many mouth-breathers in the comments parrot that falseness back) and that there is a fair-amount of misinformation in his videos; opinions are all fine and dandy, but don't position your opinion as the truth or, "just how things are."
He responded with, "I do opinion pieces, it's not hard to grasp."
Thanks tips. I responded back that, "that's fine, but don't say a game is shit when it isn't and you just don't like it. When you start off the video gushing over how awesome and incredible and amazing and stupendous SMB is, you're setting up the rest of the video to be a comparison to that series and the undeserved bashing on the AK games. That's not fair to the audience, etc.etc."
The VERY FIRST words in his reply were, (paraphrasing) "I don't agree with you and I want to continue this pissing match, so (not paraphrasing) HUMOR ME; what makes your opinion trump mine?"
I then reiterated what I wrote in the first comment and answered with, "if you wish to be humoured, go watch Whose Line is it Anyways? It'll do a better job than I could."
The first words of his next response? "I don't like your condescension." lol Dude, just because you can't handle constructive criticism, doesn't make me condescending.
Thus, what I thought (and hoped) to be a person of a bit of integrity and class, turned out to be a typical YouTuber, with an attitude due to their, "YouTube clout!"
I'm still subscribed to his channel and I have never NOT wanted to watch another video since then, but I just haven't watched another of his videos; no burning desire anymore, especially with so much misinformation and bootlicking.
Rant done, sorry again!
EDIT 2** Went to back to see my comment string and I think I deleted it
lol