DigitalDuck
Quack!
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2018
- Location
- Lincs, UK
- Favourite title
- Shenmue
- Currently playing
- Shenmue
- XBL
- DuckProgrammer
To me it's important because that's what I feel when people use those newspeak. Why keep using those words if you don't believe what they are being used for ? That's the point I was making. There's really a gap these days.
And hell, maybe you were actually thinking about those types of doctrines, and I wanted to know, that's why I don't like those words.
Why let assholes determine the meaning of words? I use words according to their actual meaning, not according to some brainwashed cult member's interpretation of it. That's why I use quotes around the latter.
We already have "you can't use that word, that's our word", we don't also need "you can't use that word, that's their word". If someone wants to say they're in support of equality, especially alongside a description of exactly what they mean, why prescribe different speech upon them?
But I agree that there are other ways of putting it. After all, strictly speaking I don't believe in equality, as I don't feel two people are equal if their actions are inequal. I support the imprisonment of murderers, and the encouragement of philanthropists, despite this treatment clearly being unequal. I believe people should be judged on their actions and abilities and not on their physical characteristics. This would probably be better described as a meritocracy.
The problem with assigning any particular vaguely political label is that politics are completely subjective, and any and every label is going to mean different things to different people. Rather than attaching yourself only to a label, it's necessary to describe your viewpoints, however briefly.